Poh Meng Engineering Pte Ltd
2.8 out of 5 stars.
Get weekly updates, new jobs, and reviews

Poh Meng Engineering Pte Ltd Employee Reviews

Review this company
Job Title
Singapore4 reviews

Ratings by category

2.8Work-Life Balance

Sort by

Showing all 4 reviews

Overall a good working place

Indeed Featured review

The most useful review selected by Indeed
Lots of work to be done quickly. Need to answer customer's inquiries and prepare quotations for them. Colleagues are friendly. The company is mainly deal with air con and ventilation systems.
Was this review helpful?


To me it was the better workplace to work. The staffs were so helpful and kind. The job scope given to me was so interesting and to get proper experience,
Was this review helpful?

Construction M&E, Elect, Build

prefer they are hard workerholic style can learn a lot of experience from each department Have to work under pressure Most of the colleagues will help each other


Long hours
Was this review helpful?

Management of work

This company you have to be independent etc progress claim submission, prepare safety document , procurement of material , verify tender equipment specification. Learn to be independent. Manage man power as per required by site. No supervisor on site so I taught the general worker, how carry out the task. Company Tour to Hong Kong.


Festive period lunch provided by the company


Very Busy
Was this review helpful?

Rate your recent company

Share your experience to help others

Want to know more about working here?

Ask a question about working or interviewing at Poh Meng Engineering Pte Ltd. Our community is ready to answer.Ask a Question

Overall rating

Based on 4 reviews

Ratings by category

2.8 out of 5 stars for Work/Life Balance
2.5 out of 5 stars for Salary/Benefits
2.5 out of 5 stars for Job Security/Advancement
2.3 out of 5 stars for Management
2.3 out of 5 stars for Culture

Poh Meng Engineering Pte Ltd Reviews by Location

  • Companies
  • Poh Meng Engineering Pte Ltd
  • Employee Reviews
Tell us how to improve this page
What would you add or change?